// you’re reading...

Politics & Society

NSF/NSmen injuries – should MINDEF pay?

I felt disturbed when I read this morning’s papers about how a young man in the prime of his life, fell into a coma while on a storeman duty in camp. MINDEF stopped paying for his hospitalization fees since a year ago, citing the reason that his was not a service injury since there was uncertainty over whether he was actually “performing” his duty at the time of the incident. The thing is, this serviceman was last seen a few minutes before he was found unconcious, resting in his bunk.

My personal interpretation of this is that,  if nobody can prove that his injuries were not service-related, he should be given the benefit of doubt and receive due compensation from MINDEF since he was supposed to be on duty at the time. Assuming nobody knew better, it’s plausible to argue that he could have been resting in his bunk because he felt unwell while performing duty and then somehow he did not get better and collapsed. It’s also plausible to argue that he could have complained about being unwell to somebody else but it was not acknowledged or disclosed. Whatever the case, in situations where the cirumstances are unclear, I think benefit of doubt should be given to injured servicemen.

What is disturbing here is not just the fact that MINDEF is denying responsibility for the well-being of a serviceman who suffered injuries in MINDEF’s premises, while on duty for the country. I would like to point out the existence of double standards in dealing with such matters.

I am doing this to raise awareness of the existence of double standards in MINDEF’s treatment of servicemen injuries, in the hope that this will help servicemen in similar situations who feel that they should be receiving fair compensation. This is a matter of public concern, since all Singaporan males have to serve NS. I don’t think there is any classified information here, and I am not providing any information that will lead to identification of the specific unit and persons involved.

Several years ago when I was serving NS in a reservist unit, we had a case of an NSman (reservist) who collapsed while having breakfast at a coffeeshop near his home in his army fatigues, before he was supposed to report to camp for reservice. He subsequently fell into a coma and, to my knowledge, several months later he was still comatose at home. Of course, under that circumstance it was quite obvious that since he was not in camp at the time, and he was obviously not doing anything related to national service which led to his collapse, it can be argued easily that it was not a service-related injury.

However, under lobbying and appeals by senior officers of the unit, MINDEF relented and, while I do not know the specific details of the compensation, my understanding is that he was indeed provided with some hospitalization benefits, which I personally think is fair, since it cannot be determined whether he collapsed as a result of stress of having to go back for reservice (which I argue is service-related since in that context he would not have collapsed otherwise) or other reasons. I have to stress that I do not know the details of the hospitalization benefits accorded to him, but the main issue is – why should MINDEF deny such an outright case of compensation for a serviceman who was in camp at the time of collapse when they provided some form of hospitalization financial aid for a NSman who was not even on his way to camp yet?

This case has serious implications for the sons of Singapore who give up a significant amount of time and effort to protect the country. When Singapore needs us to fight for the country, we are asked to give up our lives. When a serviceman gives his life while supposedly on duty, he has to take MINDEF to court to fight for the compensation he deserves. Should the case be thrown out against the serviceman, it would set a precedence for future cases of service injury claims.

Bottomline: What kind of message is MINDEF sending to Singaporeans? That the government will not be liable if our sons die during NS for unknown reasons? This will only lead more able Singaporeans to emigrate to avoid their sons having to waste their lives doing NS.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • blogmarks
  • Blogsvine
  • De.lirio.us
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Live
  • MyShare
  • NewsVine
  • Print this article!
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb

No related posts.

Discussion

10 comments for “NSF/NSmen injuries – should MINDEF pay?”

  1. [...] Have you ever wondered why we must serve [Editor's note: Better to read in order to catch the drift] – Digital Terrorist: Why is the SAF wasting Your Money to send me Overseas, again? – Diary of A Singaporean Mind: NS Man collapsed in camp in his uniform… – this lush garden within: NSF/NSmen injuries – should MINDEF pay? [...]

    Posted by The Singapore Daily » Blog Archive » Daily SG: 15 Jan 2009 | January 15, 2009, 11:25 am
  2. the benefit of doubt argument is a reasonable one for saf to follow.

    yes they should pay since he was in camp when it happened. of course we must know that saf money is tax-payer money and we don’t want our money to be foolishly spent. but in this case, i think saf has a responsibility but pay minimum as it is long term rehab. it is win-win for all sgporeans and saf.

    Posted by Krusty | January 15, 2009, 1:37 pm
  3. I would gladly have my taxes used to pay for such issues. Because we are a citizen army, and they are our fellow Singaporeans too.

    Posted by CelluloidReality | January 15, 2009, 3:47 pm
  4. I do not understand why this case has to go to court in the first place. We have compulsory conscription. We do not allow the teenager to book out before 6pm, before handing over the keys.
    Some top notch scholar – army – lawyer obviously goof up, when you consider the back lash against the whole concept of SAF conscription now that this matter has gone to press.

    Posted by familyman | January 15, 2009, 4:24 pm
  5. CelluloidReality

    Well said dude. TOTALLY AGREE.

    Posted by The Void Deck | January 15, 2009, 7:24 pm
  6. [...] is a good commentary of the main article. a young man in the prime of his life, fell into a coma while on a storeman [...]

    Posted by MINDEF: not responsible till proven responsible, or responsible till not proven so? « Everyday’s Life in a Snapshot | January 15, 2009, 11:17 pm
  7. That’s why now all NS men are encouraged to buy insurance

    Posted by NSMen | January 15, 2009, 11:47 pm
  8. That is why anybody with a son who is able to, is getting the hell out of Singapore and migrating to NZ, Aussie. All this talk about stayers, quitter and nation building is bollocks, when the nation turns its head away when a teenage falls into coma while on National Service.
    We have to ensure our teenages are not moulded into this idea of citizenry and patriotism if SAF wins this case. Somebody definitely goofed up in SAF at the highest level.

    Maybe Teo Chee Hean should donate his salary increase to upkeep this poor chap.

    Bollocks.

    Posted by pissed | January 16, 2009, 10:16 am
  9. on the other hand… An MP having lunch was set on fire and get his hospitalisation bills settled by the govt. So is having lunch now considered as being on duty for the MP… lol… 1 country 2 laws….

    Posted by Anonymous | January 16, 2009, 4:06 pm
  10. [...] of A Singaporean Mind: NS Man collapsed in camp in his uniform… – this lush garden within: NSF/NSmen injuries – should MINDEF pay? – the boy who knew too much: A debt of national gratitude – Everyday’s Life in a Snapshot: [...]

    Posted by The Singapore Daily » Blog Archive » Weekly Roundup: Week 03 | January 17, 2009, 11:41 am

Post a comment