<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is CPF really for?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mrbiao.com/blog/what-is-cpf-really-for.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mrbiao.com/blog/what-is-cpf-really-for.html</link>
	<description>mrbiao</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:30:44 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Idetrorce</title>
		<link>http://www.mrbiao.com/blog/what-is-cpf-really-for.html/comment-page-1#comment-7798</link>
		<dc:creator>Idetrorce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 06:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrbiao.com/blog/what-is-cpf-really-for.html#comment-7798</guid>
		<description>very interesting, but I don&#039;t agree with you 
Idetrorce</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very interesting, but I don&#8217;t agree with you<br />
Idetrorce</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.mrbiao.com/blog/what-is-cpf-really-for.html/comment-page-1#comment-2994</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrbiao.com/blog/what-is-cpf-really-for.html#comment-2994</guid>
		<description>to: now in canada,

since u met some of them who collected all their CPF monies, why dun u asked them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to: now in canada,</p>
<p>since u met some of them who collected all their CPF monies, why dun u asked them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: now in canada</title>
		<link>http://www.mrbiao.com/blog/what-is-cpf-really-for.html/comment-page-1#comment-2070</link>
		<dc:creator>now in canada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 20:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrbiao.com/blog/what-is-cpf-really-for.html#comment-2070</guid>
		<description>I met a couple of ex-Singaporeans and thye all got their CPFs. I&#039;m more concerned of it will be taxed... any ideas anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I met a couple of ex-Singaporeans and thye all got their CPFs. I&#8217;m more concerned of it will be taxed&#8230; any ideas anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eugene</title>
		<link>http://www.mrbiao.com/blog/what-is-cpf-really-for.html/comment-page-1#comment-1521</link>
		<dc:creator>eugene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 03:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrbiao.com/blog/what-is-cpf-really-for.html#comment-1521</guid>
		<description>Question:  If I renounce my Singaporean citizenship, coz I want to stay where I now am, will I get all my CPF back....has anyone tried and suceeded doing this?  Or does the Singaporean government think of some way of holding on to it....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question:  If I renounce my Singaporean citizenship, coz I want to stay where I now am, will I get all my CPF back&#8230;.has anyone tried and suceeded doing this?  Or does the Singaporean government think of some way of holding on to it&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Convinced</title>
		<link>http://www.mrbiao.com/blog/what-is-cpf-really-for.html/comment-page-1#comment-1003</link>
		<dc:creator>Convinced</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 03:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrbiao.com/blog/what-is-cpf-really-for.html#comment-1003</guid>
		<description>This is probably another hidden reason for the GST increase. Singaporeans will have to foot the bills for the mistakes made by their naive majority who voted in the PAP government. Most unfair to those who opposed and worst, for those with no chance to vote. 

Temasek set up $500 million &#039;charitable&#039; fund to invest in other countries. Singaporean&#039;s money is used to &#039;help others&#039; in order to repair Temasek&#039;s international image after the many fiasco. 

Please enlighten me on these questions:
1. How many of these directors and office holders at Temasek and GIC are qualified/formally trained to handle investments? Many millions of dollars in payroll could have been saved or channelled for other usage if GIC places its fund with reputable fund managers for returns. With so many acclaimed fund managers in the world, is there a need for Temasek and worst, inept/unqualified people there to invest Singaporeans&#039; money? 

2. Why is it that Ho Ching can still sit tight despite all the fiasco at Temasek? With her dubious track record, she can still head Temasek. Will the same opportunity be given to a non Lee-clan member with Ho Ching&#039;s less than honourable achievements? Rated as among Asia&#039;s most powerful women. Rated as among Asia&#039;s most powerful women purely on Singaporean&#039;s Temasek money. This company really needs foreign talents to generate good returns for Singaporeans and at a lower cost.  This is assuming that we can&#039;t find a much better Singaporean candidate than Ho Ching&#039;s calibre. Oh dear! Forgotten that she&#039;s indeed a foreign talent integrated into Lee family and therefore, enjoy much more priviledges than others.

3. Have any of our ministers ever take responsibilities for mistakes made? This is unheard of and yet Singaporeans have to work perpetually harder to contribute towards their ridiculously self-justifed ballooning payroll. 

If PAP still garner the same level of support at the next election, Singaporeans will remain the modern slaves to their government. Ironically, this is their own decision, borne out of naivety and simple-mindedness despite being highly-educated. Laughable indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is probably another hidden reason for the GST increase. Singaporeans will have to foot the bills for the mistakes made by their naive majority who voted in the PAP government. Most unfair to those who opposed and worst, for those with no chance to vote. </p>
<p>Temasek set up $500 million &#8216;charitable&#8217; fund to invest in other countries. Singaporean&#8217;s money is used to &#8216;help others&#8217; in order to repair Temasek&#8217;s international image after the many fiasco. </p>
<p>Please enlighten me on these questions:<br />
1. How many of these directors and office holders at Temasek and GIC are qualified/formally trained to handle investments? Many millions of dollars in payroll could have been saved or channelled for other usage if GIC places its fund with reputable fund managers for returns. With so many acclaimed fund managers in the world, is there a need for Temasek and worst, inept/unqualified people there to invest Singaporeans&#8217; money? </p>
<p>2. Why is it that Ho Ching can still sit tight despite all the fiasco at Temasek? With her dubious track record, she can still head Temasek. Will the same opportunity be given to a non Lee-clan member with Ho Ching&#8217;s less than honourable achievements? Rated as among Asia&#8217;s most powerful women. Rated as among Asia&#8217;s most powerful women purely on Singaporean&#8217;s Temasek money. This company really needs foreign talents to generate good returns for Singaporeans and at a lower cost.  This is assuming that we can&#8217;t find a much better Singaporean candidate than Ho Ching&#8217;s calibre. Oh dear! Forgotten that she&#8217;s indeed a foreign talent integrated into Lee family and therefore, enjoy much more priviledges than others.</p>
<p>3. Have any of our ministers ever take responsibilities for mistakes made? This is unheard of and yet Singaporeans have to work perpetually harder to contribute towards their ridiculously self-justifed ballooning payroll. </p>
<p>If PAP still garner the same level of support at the next election, Singaporeans will remain the modern slaves to their government. Ironically, this is their own decision, borne out of naivety and simple-mindedness despite being highly-educated. Laughable indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quitter-Wannanbe</title>
		<link>http://www.mrbiao.com/blog/what-is-cpf-really-for.html/comment-page-1#comment-948</link>
		<dc:creator>Quitter-Wannanbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 09:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrbiao.com/blog/what-is-cpf-really-for.html#comment-948</guid>
		<description>i agree that the lack of transparency surrounding cpf is extremely disconcerting. looking at the various constraints governing cpf withdrawal, i would agree with OrnateGhost.

in fact, my pessimism extends to the whole of sillipore. i&#039;ll give her 10 years before she really goes downhill... in the meantime, i&#039;m planning for my pr and renunciation of citizenship. 

of course, i just might decide to stay on after 2011 if silliporeans cld wake up their ideas, vote in significant oppo and change the system. but then again, some pple never learn...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree that the lack of transparency surrounding cpf is extremely disconcerting. looking at the various constraints governing cpf withdrawal, i would agree with OrnateGhost.</p>
<p>in fact, my pessimism extends to the whole of sillipore. i&#8217;ll give her 10 years before she really goes downhill&#8230; in the meantime, i&#8217;m planning for my pr and renunciation of citizenship. </p>
<p>of course, i just might decide to stay on after 2011 if silliporeans cld wake up their ideas, vote in significant oppo and change the system. but then again, some pple never learn&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: derrick</title>
		<link>http://www.mrbiao.com/blog/what-is-cpf-really-for.html/comment-page-1#comment-707</link>
		<dc:creator>derrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 05:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrbiao.com/blog/what-is-cpf-really-for.html#comment-707</guid>
		<description>Long time ago, CPF meant Coffin Paid For.
Now, CPF evolves to mean....Cannot Pay Finished.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long time ago, CPF meant Coffin Paid For.<br />
Now, CPF evolves to mean&#8230;.Cannot Pay Finished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.mrbiao.com/blog/what-is-cpf-really-for.html/comment-page-1#comment-672</link>
		<dc:creator>brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrbiao.com/blog/what-is-cpf-really-for.html#comment-672</guid>
		<description>mrbiao,
why see one side ?

Singapore tax is low ? How&#039;s about everything else where Singapore is running as Incorporated entity where the gahmen are lusting way to get your money without accountability and transparency ?

everytime, Singapore want to compare, they only compare one side. That&#039;s just one feature of Singapore Incorporated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mrbiao,<br />
why see one side ?</p>
<p>Singapore tax is low ? How&#8217;s about everything else where Singapore is running as Incorporated entity where the gahmen are lusting way to get your money without accountability and transparency ?</p>
<p>everytime, Singapore want to compare, they only compare one side. That&#8217;s just one feature of Singapore Incorporated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OrnateGhost</title>
		<link>http://www.mrbiao.com/blog/what-is-cpf-really-for.html/comment-page-1#comment-670</link>
		<dc:creator>OrnateGhost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 05:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrbiao.com/blog/what-is-cpf-really-for.html#comment-670</guid>
		<description>There is a big conspiracy to the CPF ever since Goh Chok Tong made the announcement to open it up for alternative investments and usage in the mid 90&#039;s.

The conspiracy derives from 1 simple motivation:
- There are insufficient monies to fund a complete CPF withdrawal by retiring citizens in an aging population

All schemes derived thereafter are but just tactics to prevent massive withdrawal. 

As to why there is not enough money, just look at the blunders of GIC and Temasek and military spending. The greed of the present cadre is insignificant ocmpare to the mistakes made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a big conspiracy to the CPF ever since Goh Chok Tong made the announcement to open it up for alternative investments and usage in the mid 90&#8217;s.</p>
<p>The conspiracy derives from 1 simple motivation:<br />
- There are insufficient monies to fund a complete CPF withdrawal by retiring citizens in an aging population</p>
<p>All schemes derived thereafter are but just tactics to prevent massive withdrawal. </p>
<p>As to why there is not enough money, just look at the blunders of GIC and Temasek and military spending. The greed of the present cadre is insignificant ocmpare to the mistakes made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DickTracy</title>
		<link>http://www.mrbiao.com/blog/what-is-cpf-really-for.html/comment-page-1#comment-650</link>
		<dc:creator>DickTracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrbiao.com/blog/what-is-cpf-really-for.html#comment-650</guid>
		<description>Correction - One is NOT allowed to withdraw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction &#8211; One is NOT allowed to withdraw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
